Abortion Argument: pro-life or Pro-Choice?
Abortion has been a hot topic for the past decade. Pro-life and pro-choice groups have been fighting the never-ending opinionated battle on if stillbirth should be legal of not. Over the years these ii groups have gained support from governmental advocates at both the local anaesthetic and national levels arguing on their behalf to pass an array of abortion related bills. Recently, pro-life groups have been pressing numerous bills through state legislatures severely restricting abortion practices.
Some of these bills complicate the Kansas Fetal Pain Bill placing limits on abortions after 22 weeks based on research that the fetus can have pain at this point and the Ohio Heartbeat Bill which would subvert abortion at the first detectable fetal blinking, as early as three weeks into a pregnancy. It is my belief that pro-life and governmental bills supporting pro-life stances ar a rapine of womens rights restraining her from fashioning the personal and intimate decision of whether she feels she can excite to having a child as well as adding an long amount of stress to a womanhood while reservation this already distressing decision.
Pro-life groups and the government are unconstitutionally attempting to invade a womans privacy and prevent her from making the personal decision of aborting a fetus. According to the dictionary, abortion is the removal of an embryo or fetus from the uterus in battle array to end a pregnancy. The fetus is in and involves the womans body. The government and pro-life advocates should not be allowed to infringe on this right by making laws forbidding a woman from having an abortion. For example, the `Heartbeat Bill from Ohio stating that woman cannot have an abortion after a detectable heartbeat is felt (3 weeks) would do just that. On a Cleveland local news website,
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.