The Meaninglessness of External Causes

Some philosophers say that our life is meansless because it has a prescribed end. This is a strange assertion: is a movie rendered sumless because of its boundedness? Some things acquire a subject matter precisely because they be finite: consider academic studies, for instance. It would seem that meaningfulness does not weigh upon matters temporary. We all share the belief that we infer meaning from outside(a) references. Something large than us - and outside us - bestows meaning upon our lives: God, the State, a cordial institution, an historical cause. Yet, this belief is misplaced and mistaken. If such an external source of meaning were to depend upon us for its definition (hence, for its meaning) - how could we take in meaning from it? A cyclical argument ensues. We can neer derive meaning from that whose in truth meaning (or definition) is capable on us. The defined cannot define the definer. To use the defined as go of its own definition (by the vice of its i nclusion in the definer) is the very definition of a tautology, the gravest of logical fallacies. On the other overturn: if such an external source of meaning were NOT dependent on us for its definition or meaning - once again it would study been of no use in our quest for meaning and definition. That which is perfectly independent of us - is absolutely free of each(prenominal) interaction with us because such an interaction would inevitably have customary a part of its definition or meaning. And that, which is devoid of any interaction with us - cannot be known to us. We know about(predicate) something by interacting with it. The very exchange of information - through the senses - is an interaction. Thus, both we help oneself as part of the definition or the meaning of an external... If you neediness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit ou! r page: write my essay