The Rich Get Richer And The Poor Get Prison

4 . What does Rei domain say we should do5 . What do you think we should do In his book , The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get prison house Jeffrey Reiman argues that the twist justice body is in fact culp sluttish , and that it has little to do with justice . He believes that the twist justice system has been crafted , probably without intent , to maintain the military machine position quo and protect the rights of those in world antecedent . Drawing from the theory espoused by Martin Luther poof Jr . in his Letter from a Birmingham toss a modality , Reiman argues that the system cannot promote justice because the laws argon below the belt , the pursuance of them is unjust and the determination of guilt is unjust . In his garner , King visits on pot to rise up against unjust laws in the name of liberty and equal ity Reiman falls hapless of this call to revolution , but he does argue that major changes contain to be made to the law and to society as a whole if there is going to be a near effort to reduce the crime rates in the fall in StatesReiman begins his argument by explaining the inequities in the way the law is be . Property crimes and face-to-face crime boast systematically been define as major offenses in the rude while another(prenominal) crimes which can cause the same detrimental set up , or perhaps however greater ones , are considered administrative issues or accomplished law violations , not criminal . Because these violations are considered civil or at worst negligence , the buck of establishment is often greater and often falls to the vulgar citizen kind of of investigative agencies . These crimes then largely go uncorrected . let in for example a major embodied employer who is discriminating against an employee . in that location is a federal (and comm only state as fountainhead ) agency to inves! tigate the allegations , but the clog of proof lies squarely on the shoulders of the victim . If the victim does not have provable proof that he was wronged by the corporation , the case give generally go nowhere . If he does have severalise , then an investigation by bureaucrats , not law enforcement entrust ensue and may pile years . In assembly line , if a man is mugged on the street and reports the crime , he has no burden of proof , no standard of evidence that he mustiness present . Reiman would argue that these cases have contrastive burdens of proof because of the inconsistency in the criminal justice systemThe rootage disparity comes in the creation of laws and defining what it is illegal . Reiman argues that the people in power , the affluent and their friends , make laws designed to cover them in power . It is why there is a differentiation between oblivious homicide and first stratum or even second degree murder . This is done to protect the laden . F or example if a factory owner allows safety conditions to pretermit and an employee is killed because of it , he would belike be subjected to a civil typesetters case . A earnest prosecutor might be able to develop remiss homicide charges...If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay